Then I start thinking - I could use PHP to partial out the pieces of reused markup but they I'll need apache and MAMP. So, I'm looking at some setup time to gather the boilerplate HTML structure for those pages, and then I'll have to copy and paste site-wide markup like the menu, on each page every time I make a change. I'm going to want to add some fancy user interaction/animation, and I'll need to manage bits of JavaScript programs or 'packages' throughout the application. You'll also likely use a preprocessor of some sort. Things like stylus variables allow me to quickly test out ideas and mixins allow me to author super readable style rules. I love writing CSS and I love using Stylus to do that. I'm definitly going to use CSS preprocessor. I want to keep track of what the visitor has and hasn't interacted with so I can make smart decisions about delivering the right content for them. I want to use something with a great router that handles that page linking inside the site and only updates the unique parts of the page that have changed. This means when you land on the initial page–when you click about–when you click contact and so on - each subsequent page will be searched for, read over, reinterpreted, and rerender - and will also loose any 'state' it had. However, every time you click a link on a site like that - that whole process has to happen again. It uses this DOM to paint what you see on the screen. The browser will look this document over, make some notes, and then create its own model of that document in memory. When you ask the browser to retrieve something from a specified URL, the server will point you to an HTML document (or it may smash together some PHP or JS first) - and then point you to that document. but I also want it to be fun.Ī standard website is made up of documents / sorta. I want others to be able to jump in and contribute. I want something that can be extended and can scale up if the project gains complexity. I want to deploy my changes to the host with ease and safety. I want to keep track of my changes with version control. I want to make things that feel snappy and fancy and "native", and I want the authoring process to be manageable. We all want our layouts to be responsive to all screen sizes and contexts. The client(person) often expects full control over the content. This type of site isn't typically complex but it's not as simple as it used to be, or - it is, but it is also not. The kind of website I'm going to outline here, is the classic 4-page brochure website. OR consider that you may have a distorted view of time - take a deep breath - and allow yourself to relax for a bit. More and more of us are building 'web-applications' - or "websites that do things." Some people write standard HTML pages or got excited about a PHP or JavaScript framework. You can use WordPress as a free way to manage user content for simple or very complex/dynamic sites or - use a static-site generator to spit out lean HTML pages. They are probably the smart ones who learned how to make money instead of how to write programs. Some people curate content on the SquareSpace platform and change the logo a bit - or customise a Tumblr blog theme. What is involved in building a website in 2017?īuilding " a website" can mean many different things.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |